GateAI

GATE CSE Graph Theory PYQs

Standard yield0.8% of Programming and Data Structures

In Programming and Data Structures, graph representation questions evaluate asymptotic time and space complexities associated with augmenting or manipulating st… Read the guide

Questions
1
Asked
2016
Total marks
2
Marks / paper
0.1

1 GATE CSE Graph Theory PYQs with solutions, from Programming and Data Structures. Browse all GATE CSE PYQs.

What GATE tests in Graph Theory

Concepts, patterns, formulas and traps distilled from past papers.

In Programming and Data Structures, graph representation questions evaluate asymptotic time and space complexities associated with augmenting or manipulating standard graph data structures like adjacency lists and matrices. GATE tests students' ability to exploit non-comparison sorting (such as radix/counting sort) or auxiliary direct-address tables when standard pointer linkages need to be constructed efficiently.

Core concepts

  • Adjacency list representation of undirected graphs
  • Twin pointers linking (u, v) and (v, u) list nodes
  • Linear-time non-comparison sorting (Radix / Counting sort) on edge lists
  • Time complexity analysis with unconstrained auxiliary memory

Recurring question patterns

  • Graph Representation Augmentation and Time Complexity

    RareMCQ2 marks2016

    Given a graph G=(V,E)G=(V, E) with ∣V∣=n|V|=n and ∣E∣=m|E|=m stored in a standard representation (e.g., adjacency list), determine the optimal time complexity to compute cross-pointers, augment node entries (e.g., twin pointers for undirected edges), or convert representations when auxiliary space is unconstrained.

Formulas GATE uses

Total Adjacency List Size for Undirected Graphs

∑v∈Vdeg(v)=2m\sum_{v \in V} \text{deg}(v) = 2m

Used to count total directed edge entries across all adjacency list chains in an undirected graph with mm edges.

Radix / Counting Sort over Vertex Index Range

T(n,m)=Θ(n+m)T(n, m) = \Theta(n + m)

Used when sorting 2m2m edge pairs (u,v)(u, v) where keys u,v∈{1,…,n}u, v \in \{1, \dots, n\} to achieve linear-time matching of twin entries.

Examiner traps in Graph Theory

  • Assuming pairwise twin lookup requires a nested search or comparison sort, leading to incorrect choices like (m2) or (m log m)
  • Confusing graph vertices n and edges m when applying counting sort across the key range [1, n] for 2m elements
  • Overlooking the constraint that memory size is unconstrained, which enables auxiliary hashing, lookup tables, or counting sort

How questions are asked

  • Asymptotic time complexity analysis of graph data structure transformations
  • Data structure pointer manipulation efficiency

Paper trends

  • Graph questions in the Programming and Data Structures section focus on structural representations, memory pointers, and algorithmic manipulation of adjacency list nodes rather than high-level graph theory proofs.

    2016

Difficulty notes

Medium questions require combining graph representation properties (number of entries = 2m2m) with algorithmic techniques (such as counting sort on keys bounded by nn) to achieve an optimal Θ(n+m)\Theta(n+m) bound instead of a naive search.