Let us analyze the read and write sets for each instruction based on the format OP Ri, Rj, Rk (where Ri is written, and Rj, Rk are read):
I1: Writes R1, Reads R2, R3
I2: Writes R7, Reads R1, R3
I3: Writes R4, Reads R1, R5
I4: Writes R3, Reads R2, R4
I5: Writes R7, Reads R8, R9
Definitions of Data Dependences:
True Data Dependence (RAW): An instruction reads a value written by an earlier instruction.
Anti-dependence (WAR): An instruction writes to a register that is read by an earlier instruction.
Output dependence (WAW): An instruction writes to a register that is also written by an earlier instruction.
Statement Analysis:
S1: Between I2 (writes R7) and I5 (writes R7), both write to the same register R7. This is an output dependence (WAW), not an anti-dependence. Thus, S1 is FALSE.
S2: Instruction I2 reads register R3, while subsequent instruction I4 writes to register R3. This constitutes a Write-After-Read (WAR) relation, which is an anti-dependence. Thus, S2 is TRUE.
S3: In a typical in-order pipeline (like the standard 5-stage RISC pipeline), operands are read in the Instruction Decode (ID) stage and written in the Write Back (WB) stage. Since instructions flow in order, reading occurs before the write-back of a subsequent instruction; thus, anti-dependencies do not cause stalls. In out-of-order execution, WAR hazards can also be eliminated using register renaming without stalls. Thus, S3 is FALSE.
Therefore, only statement S2 is true, which corresponds to option (B).